BookKeptevidence chain
Compared

How BookKept compares

No single product does what BookKept does, which is the point of it and also what makes a fair comparison hard. So here it is against the four things an agency at this size actually uses today: a timesheet and self-billing system, a compliance platform, Templio, and a spreadsheet. Read from what each publishes, in August 2026. If we have something wrong, write and we will change it.

The shape of the market

Back-office systems hold timesheets and self-billing and stop there: none of the eighteen we checked generates a Key Information Document, keeps an umbrella register or produces the intermediaries return. Compliance platforms hold KIDs, umbrella due diligence and an audit trail and stop there: no timesheets, no invoicing, so the rate that goes on the KID is retyped from the system that already holds it. Templio is the nearest single product to BookKept, a strong back office with an IR35 engine and an AWR clock, and it does not hold the umbrella chain, the KID or the intermediaries return. The spreadsheet does whatever the person who built it remembered to add.

What none of them holds is the join: the placement, its weeks, its invoices, its KID, its status determination and its umbrella check as one record with one audit trail, which is the thing an inspection asks for and the thing BookKept exists to keep.

Row by row

What is held BookKept Timesheet system
(e.g. Timesheet Portal)
Compliance platform
(SafeRec, PaySentry, DiligenceHub)
Templio Spreadsheet
The back office
Timesheets with client approvalYes, magic-link approval, worker-entered weeksYesNot their scopeYes, magic-link approvalBy email and memory
Self-billing invoices (HMRC 700/62 wording, agreement gate)Yes, refused without a live agreementYesNot their scopeYes, dual self-billingA template somebody edits
Client invoices raised from the same approved weekYes, with credit notesTypicallyNot their scopeYesRetyped
Accounting export (Xero)CSV batches, what is new per seriesTypicallyNot their scopeXeroManual
The compliance record
Key Information Documents generated from the placement (reg 13A)Yes, from the record, audited on issueNo (0 of 18 checked)Yes, from typed-in factsNot statedA Word template
Right-to-work register with method and recheck dateYes, with the 1 October 2026 change as a dated ruleNot statedNot statedDocument vault with expiry datesA column
Umbrella register with evidence and joint-liability positionYes, per umbrella, red when a live placement has no current fileNoYes, their coreNoA folder
AWR qualifying clock (12 weeks, breaks, pauses)Yes, from approved weeks, calendar as the warningNot statedNot their scopeYes, AWR parityA formula
IR35: client size and the status determination statement, held against the placementYes, with the 45-day disagreement window; refuses gross self-billing without itNot statedNot their scopeIR35 engineA PDF somewhere
Employment intermediaries quarterly returnYes, from the record; never infers genderNoNot statedNoHand-built each quarter
One evidence pack per placement, the whole chainYes, print or JSON; see oneNoTheir halfNot statedNo
Audit trailHash-chained, append-only at the database, verifiable by anyone with the rowsNot statedYes7-year immutable audit trailFile history, if lucky
The terms
Published pricesYes, five tiers by contractor countMostly quote-only (6 of 8 incumbents)Yes£129 / £299 / £499 by contractor bandFree, plus the person
At fifteen contractors£199 a month, one systemAbout £98 a month£99 to £299 a month£129 a monthA day a month of somebody's time
Free tierUp to three contractors, the whole systemTrialsYes, every compliance entrant has oneNot statedYes
Setup feeNone; optional paid migration for a messy bookCommon, £600 to £2,500 where chargedVariesNot statedNone
SupportFree, a person, replies from himOne incumbent bills £45 to £80 per phone callVariesNot statedYou
Your data backYour whole book from Settings, any time; verified offboarding bundleVariesVariesNot statedIt is a file

Read from the vendors' own published pages between 12 and 15 August 2026. "Not stated" means we could not find it on their site, not that they lack it. Prices are the published monthly rates at or around fifteen active contractors, before VAT.

What the two-vendor stack costs

An agency covering this ground today is usually paying a timesheet system and a compliance platform that do not talk to each other: roughly £98 to £129 a month for the first and £99 to £299 for the second, £197 to £428 in all, and the join between them is a person retyping rates. Core is £199 and holds the join. That is the whole argument, and it only stands because the KID, the umbrella register, the status determination record and the intermediaries return are in the product now.

What BookKept does not do, so you can compare fairly

It never moves money: no payroll, no payments, no factoring. It does not decide IR35 status; it records the client's determination and refuses to pay a company gross without one. It does not run right-to-work checks; it records the check made and when the next is due. If your funder gives you a back office with the money, this sits beside it holding the proof, not in front of it. The full list is in the terms, section 5.

See it working

Compare against the real thing, not the table

The demo agency is live in every feature with a fictional book you are free to change. Open a placement, print its evidence pack, and decide whether the join is worth £199.

Start free Pricing