BookKeptevidence chain
Guide · the dated changes

UK recruitment compliance timeline, 2026 to 2027

The ground under contract recruitment moves on known dates. This is every one of them in order, what each actually asks, and the record an agency needs to be holding when it arrives. Nothing here is a prediction; each entry cites what establishes it.

Compliance conversations in this industry tend to arrive as rumour, usually the week before something lands. The dates below are fixed and published. An agency that reads them once and shapes its records accordingly meets each one as an administrative change rather than a scramble.

In force now

Joint and several liability for umbrella payroll failures

Enacted in Finance Act 2026 s.24, inserting Chapter 11 into ITEPA. Where an umbrella in the chain fails to account for PAYE, the liability can land on the agency. It is strict: there is no due-diligence defence written into it, and the liability sits with the agency that holds the contract with the end client ESM2420.

What your records must show: that assessment of each umbrella was ongoing rather than a one-off at onboarding. Accreditation, payslip samples, RTI evidence, insurance and the contract, each with a date and an expiry, tied to the placements actually running through that company.

Live
April 2027

Umbrella company regulation under the Employment Rights Act 2025

Agencies answer for the umbrella companies they pay through. The direction of travel has been one-way for two years: the umbrella chain stops being someone else's problem and becomes part of the agency's own compliance surface.

What your records must show: the same file the JSL position already needs, which is why an agency that treats each umbrella as a first-class record now meets 2027 with nothing new to build.

Coming
Ongoing

The Fair Work Agency takes over enforcement

The Employment Rights Act 2025 consolidates enforcement that previously sat across the Employment Agency Standards Inspectorate, the Gangmasters and Labour Abuse Authority and HMRC's national minimum wage teams. One body, wider powers, and a single view of an agency.

What your records must show: the same things, to one inspector instead of three. Consolidation raises the cost of a gap because the gap is now visible from more angles.

In progress
Consultation open

Make Work Pay reopens the Conduct Regulations, AWR and the EAA

The rules this industry runs on are being rewritten in the open. Nobody can tell you the outcome, and anyone who does is selling something. What can be said is which records the rewrite will touch: qualifying periods, the information a worker gets before terms are agreed, and what an agency may and may not do between a worker and a hirer.

What your records must show: whatever the outcome says. The defensible position is holding the underlying facts, so a change in a threshold is a change in a number rather than a change in what you collect.

Unknown

The pattern behind all five

Every entry above asks the same underlying question in a different costume: can you evidence what you did, when, and why you believed it was right at the time. That is not five compliance projects. It is one records problem with five deadlines attached.

The trap: meeting each change with its own spreadsheet. Agencies that do this end up with the evidence for October in one place, the umbrella files in another, and no way to answer a question that crosses them, which is exactly the question an inspector asks.
The solution

BookKept holds the rules as dated configuration

Every compliance threshold in the system is a versioned pack carrying an effective date and the source that establishes it. The October 2026 right-to-work duties are already in the product, dated 1 October 2026, and switch on when that date arrives rather than when someone remembers to update software. Records are never edited, so the position on a past date stays reconstructable, which is the question an inspector actually asks.

See what it does